From: Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 23:28:41 +0100
> ...I'm afraid I can't understand: I mean doing the same but without > passing this info with 'work == weight': if driver sends this info, > why it can't instead call something like napi_continue() with > this list_move_tail() (and probably additional local_irq_disable()/ > enble() - but since it's unlikely()?) which looks much more readable, > and saves one whole unlikely if ()? Because the poll list is private to net_rx_action() and we don't want to expose implementation details like that to every ->poll() implementation. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
