On 08/29/15 at 10:55am, Jiri Benc wrote: > On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 00:39:29 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote: > > Can we fix VXLAN instead? It should be possible to receive and send both > > v4 and v6 frames and represent it with metadata on a single socket. > > That's actually what I intend to do next. But I need the flag and this > patch for that. If IPv6 is enabled, I'll open two sockets within a > single vxlan_sock for metadata based vxlan, IPv4 one and IPv6 one. It > would be easier to just open an IPv6 socket and receive both IPv4 and > IPv6 traffic through it but unfortunately, this depends on bindv6only > sysctl. We don't want to have IPv4 vxlan broken if bindv6only is set. > Therefore, we need two sockets, and the IPv6 one needs to be v6only.
Awesome, sounds great. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
