Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org> writes: > The PPRO_FENCE_BUG thing is rather questionable. I'm not sure it's > even documented, but I can't find the official PPro errata now. I > think I discussed it with Andy Glew back when Intel was starting to > document the memory ordering rules. > > I'd be willing to get rid of it. It was apparently just an early > stepping or two. > > Anybody with better google-fu than me who can find the official Intel > PPro errata?
http://download.intel.com/design/archives/processors/pro/docs/24268935.pdf Says "NoFix" for erratas 66 and 92. Bjørn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html