Hello,

On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 05:56:06PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > +struct xt_cgroup_info_v1 {
> > +   __u8            has_path;
> > +   __u8            has_classid;
> > +   __u8            invert_path;
> > +   __u8            invert_classid;
> > +   char            path[PATH_MAX];
> > +   __u32           classid;
> > +
> > +   /* kernel internal data */
> > +   void            *priv __attribute__((aligned(8)));
> > +};
> 
> Ahem.  Am I reading this right? This struct is > 4k in size?
> If so -- Ugh.  Does sizeof(path) really have to be PATH_MAX?

Hmmm... yeap but would this be an acutual problem?  We can try to make
it shorter but idk it ultimately is a path.  Another solution would be
trying to pass inode around but that is problematic with showing and
printing rules as the only way to reverse-map inode to path is walking
the tree and the cgroup may already be gone at that point.  While >4k
struct isn't pretty, this looks like the path of least resistance.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to