Send netdisco-users mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/netdisco-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of netdisco-users digest..."
Today's Topics: 1. Re: Netdisco v2 Discover Question (Joseph Bernard) 2. Re: Netdisco v2 Discover Question (Oliver Gorwits) 3. NETBIOS suck only specific IP subnets ? (?ern? Lubom?r (UNP-SSC)) 4. Timestamp/Time zone issue (David Koski)
--- Begin Message ---Do you get a bunch of errors in the logs of the web gui? Thanks, Joseph B. On Mar 13, 2014, at 4:29 PM, David Weise <[email protected]> wrote: > hi, > Nope, that has been running the whole time. > --David > > On 3/13/2014 1:01 PM, Oliver Gorwits wrote: >> Hi David, >> >> You need to start the backend daemon (netdisco-daemon) and it will >> continue the work. >> >> The discovery for all other switches and routers is currently queued in >> your database, waiting for the daemon to start. >> >> regards, >> oliver. >> >> On 2014-03-13 16:43, David Weise wrote: >>> hi Everybody, >>> I ran the following command on Netdisco v2.024004: >>> >>> ~/bin/netdisco-do -D discover -d 192.0.2.1 >>> >>> Using the core CISCO router we have. Using netdisco v1.1 it found >>> all >>> attached routers and switches and populated the database. When I ran >>> the command above it just found the core router and went no further. >>> What command must I issue to find the rest of the network? Thanks for >>> any help! >>> --David >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book >> "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their >> applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, >> this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech >> _______________________________________________ >> Netdisco mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/netdisco-users >> > > <dweise.vcf>------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book > "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their > applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, > this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech_______________________________________________ > Netdisco mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/netdisco-users
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On 2014-03-13 20:31, Joseph Bernard wrote:Do you get a bunch of errors in the logs of the web gui?Yes, as Joseph says, go to Admin -> Job Queue in the web interface and see what it says.If there are queued jobs (white rows) then either the daemon isn't running, or it's somehow misconfigured. If there are errors (red rows), hover the mouse over to see what happened.Also you can up the log level and restart the daemon to see what it's doing. Set this in your deployment.yml file:log: info And then restart the daemon and 'tail -f ~/logs/netdisco-daemon.log'. regards, oliver.Thanks, Joseph B. On Mar 13, 2014, at 4:29 PM, David Weise <[email protected]> wrote:hi, Nope, that has been running the whole time. --David On 3/13/2014 1:01 PM, Oliver Gorwits wrote:Hi David, You need to start the backend daemon (netdisco-daemon) and it will continue the work.The discovery for all other switches and routers is currently queued inyour database, waiting for the daemon to start. regards, oliver. On 2014-03-13 16:43, David Weise wrote:hi Everybody, I ran the following command on Netdisco v2.024004: ~/bin/netdisco-do -D discover -d 192.0.2.1 Using the core CISCO router we have. Using netdisco v1.1 it found allattached routers and switches and populated the database. When I ran the command above it just found the core router and went no further. What command must I issue to find the rest of the network? Thanks forany help! --David------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book"Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and theirapplications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech _______________________________________________ Netdisco mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/netdisco-users<dweise.vcf>------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book"Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and theirapplications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech_______________________________________________ Netdisco mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/netdisco-users------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book"Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and theirapplications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech _______________________________________________ Netdisco mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/netdisco-users
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Hi folks. I need to block netbios to get info from part of our network. I know, ARP and MAC suck can be limited to only specific subnets/host. How can I limit the same for NETBIOS ? S pozdravem / with regards Lubomír Černý ICT projektový manažer | ICT Project Manager UNIPETROL SERVICES, s.r.o. Kancelář | Office: Záluží 1, 436 70 Litvínov 7 Tel.: +420 476 162 150 | GSM: +420 736 506 248 | Fax: +420 476 768 432 [email protected] | www.unipetrolservices.cz
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---I have a very strange ongoing problem. A while ago I noticed that some of my timestamps in the database where 5 hours earlier but some of the timestamps were correct (node_ip.time_first/node_ip.time_last was fine, but node.time_first, node.time_recent, node.time_last were all off). So I went in to postgresql.conf and removed all my timezone settings, and the times reversed. With the ones being off no fine, and the ones that were fine is off). So obviously this is a table issue... I checked all the table definitions and they all say "timestamp without timezone" and default to "now()". So what am I missing? I don't see how the database could be the issue. The dates continue to go in the database off depending on the column, but they are all set to "without timezone".. Anyone have any thoughts? I'm anything but a whiz with postgres. Dave *------------* *David Koski* GCFA, GISP, GSEC, RHCE ITS Communications Systems and Data Centers 734-647-8993 (Office) 734-678-5824 (Mobile) [image: Description: cid:3337913627_541106]<<inline: image001.png>>
--- End Message ---
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech
_______________________________________________ Netdisco mailing list - Digest Mode [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/netdisco-users
