Send Netdot-users mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Netdot-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Multiple Neighbors on interfaces (Lupe Silva)
2. User rights in 1.0.5 and performance after postgresql
migration (Nico)
3. Re: User rights in 1.0.5 and performance after postgresql
migration (Carlos Vicente)
4. Re: User rights in 1.0.5 and performance after postgresql
migration (Anton Berezin)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 15:38:15 -0700
From: Lupe Silva <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Netdot-users] Multiple Neighbors on interfaces
To: Carlos Vicente <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Message-ID:
<CAAfpe_bXVKdcYn3KiynODBT25mEt4wkiBbwWCoK18u=+mxk...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Thanks for the suggestion. That is what I was looking for. I got that to
work.
Lupe Silva
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Carlos Vicente <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hello Lupe,
>
> Unfortunately the current DB schema only allows for one-to-one mappings.
>
> The only workaround I can suggest is creating a fake "hub" device, with a
> number of manually-added interfaces. You then assign neighbors to each
> interface, including the central site.
>
> HTH,
>
> cv
>
> On Feb 18, 2014, at 1:17 PM, Lupe Silva <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > We have a network setup using Metro Over Ethernet (MOE) mesh network.
> It basically looks like all of our remote sites a re connected to a "hub".
> When we show CDP neighbors, we see lots of neighbors on the ethernet
> interface connecting to the MOE.
> > Although it is a mesh network we are have the remote sites pointing to
> our central site in the ip setup (not using a /30 subnet), so it is a spoke
> and hub with respect to IP.
> > I want to manually add the neighbors. So our core switches ethernet
> interfaces would have 6 to 8 neighbors assigned to them.
> >
> > Right now I can only manually add one neighbor per interface. Is there
> a setting to change this? Or is there another way to accomplish this?
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Lupe Silva
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Netdot-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://osl.uoregon.edu/pipermail/netdot-users/attachments/20140218/be2a2a49/attachment-0001.html
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 10:30:28 +0100
From: Nico <[email protected]>
Subject: [Netdot-users] User rights in 1.0.5 and performance after
postgresql migration
To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
<cakxqfmuk_54qess68gv4jgev5dntfp7rbp9ysrtpx1eiwux...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hello,
I'm trying to implement user permissions on my setup, using netdot 1.0.5.
I've run into some things, i'm not sure are working as intended:
- A user with ChooseIP permission on a ipblock can create ipblocks
inside that ipblock (from the show subnet view), but cannot or edit or
delete them, and they are created by default as container thus cannot
be browsed or have IPs created inside from the drop down menu. I guess
either user shouldn't be allowed to create ipblocks at all, or should
be able to configure them after creation.
- If user has dns zone admin privileges, from the import option user
can create DNS records pointing to any IP, wether it is it inside the
subnet privileged boundaries or not, permitting the creation of
records that cannot be accesed using the dropdown menus in "IP Block
actions".
I've also changed my database from mysql to postgresql (thanks Anton),
and i am noticing that it takes way longer to draw topology graphs
with 3+ depth. Beside the database few things have changed. Maybe
postgresql need some tweaking, in the manual there are some mysql
configuration changes recommended.
Greetings,
--
Nico
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 08:56:51 -0500
From: Carlos Vicente <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Netdot-users] User rights in 1.0.5 and performance after
postgresql migration
To: Nico <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Hello Nico,
On Feb 19, 2014, at 4:30 AM, Nico <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to implement user permissions on my setup, using netdot 1.0.5.
> I've run into some things, i'm not sure are working as intended:
>
> - A user with ChooseIP permission on a ipblock can create ipblocks
> inside that ipblock (from the show subnet view), but cannot or edit or
> delete them, and they are created by default as container thus cannot
> be browsed or have IPs created inside from the drop down menu. I guess
> either user shouldn't be allowed to create ipblocks at all, or should
> be able to configure them after creation.
>
> - If user has dns zone admin privileges, from the import option user
> can create DNS records pointing to any IP, wether it is it inside the
> subnet privileged boundaries or not, permitting the creation of
> records that cannot be accesed using the dropdown menus in "IP Block
> actions?.
I?ve created a ticket to look into those things:
https://osl.uoregon.edu/redmine/issues/1796
> I've also changed my database from mysql to postgresql (thanks Anton),
> and i am noticing that it takes way longer to draw topology graphs
> with 3+ depth. Beside the database few things have changed. Maybe
> postgresql need some tweaking, in the manual there are some mysql
> configuration changes recommended.
>
I?ll defer to Anton on that one.
Best,
cv
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 15:03:07 +0100
From: Anton Berezin <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Netdot-users] User rights in 1.0.5 and performance after
postgresql migration
To: Nico <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hi Nico,
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:30:28AM +0100, Nico wrote:
> I've also changed my database from mysql to postgresql (thanks Anton),
> and i am noticing that it takes way longer to draw topology graphs
> with 3+ depth. Beside the database few things have changed. Maybe
> postgresql need some tweaking, in the manual there are some mysql
> configuration changes recommended.
There's a substantial amount of optimization work being done on the
PostgreSQL-only Netdot version in my copy of the Netdot repository.
https://github.com/tobez/Netdot
If you are brave, you are welcome to try that code. There are
significant DB schema changes as well, and it is a work in progress,
generally speaking.
--
Our society can survive even a large amount of irrational regulation.
-- John McCarthy
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Netdot-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users
End of Netdot-users Digest, Vol 63, Issue 12
********************************************
