Send Netdot-users mailing list submissions to
        [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Netdot-users digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Setting up a new server (Nico)
   2. Re: Setting up a new server (Bassett, Mark)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 13:07:00 +0100
From: Nico <[email protected]>
Subject: [Netdot-users] Setting up a new server
To: [email protected]
Message-ID:
        <CAKXQfmv7dTynM0fRNMo0SDjwAgjktyY=hs-9PS8dSOYAQ=w...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hello,

I'm in the proccess of setting up a new server for my Netdot installation.
I'm curious about the best way to do it and about performance compared
to others. I've read an old email where Carlos Vicente said, with
2000+ devices the -DIFAT proccess took like 50 minutes, wich seems
amazingly few time to me.

Current Setup:

Hardware: Regular desktop PC, hp compaq 8200 small form factor, 8Gb
RAM, Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz, "normal" 1GB sata disk
Software: Ubuntu LTS 12.04 netdot 1.0.5-rc1 + mysql
devices monitored: 1706
Total Macs in database: 105425
The time it takes to do a updatedevices -DIFAT varies beetwen 10 and 15 hours.

After convincing everyone that Netdot is good stuff, I've been given a
real server in CPD to set it up:
New Hardware is ProLiant DL360 G7, 2 x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5649  @
2.53GHz, 16GB RAM, 2x160GB SAS disks (actually in raid0)

I have a few constraints, i have to use a God-Sent datacenter
architecture that obligues me to have a frontend and backend stuff,
throwing in some virtualization is also a must. So i'm thinking on
setting 2 virtual machines, one to run the only the database and the
other the rest (apache + polling).

On the same mail i talked about, Carlos said they use one server for
database + apache and another one for polling. So i decided to send
this message to share my thoughts, and maybe get some advice or learn
from other's experiences. With some fact backing me up, maybe i can
get rid of the virtualization and backeend-frontend stuff. Don't think
it will do any good as it all runs of the same hardware, but maybe i
should install on backend apache+mysql (apache backend lol) and on the
frontend just the polling or viceversa.

Greetings,
-- 
Nico


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 18:07:32 +0000
From: "Bassett, Mark" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Netdot-users] Setting up a new server
To: Nico <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
        <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
        <b9afe1a22e5a614aac33fec49e4e157c013e7...@g4w3305.americas.hpqcorp.net>
        
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

I saw a HUGE speed increase when I split mysql off to another box.  

10-15 hours is definitely not good, likely you have some devices in there that 
are not working properly.  I suggest running the poller with debug and seeing 
where things are hanging up.  For me, we had a class of switch (old old 3com's) 
that were responding EXTREMELY slow and basically halted the entire 
updatedevices process.   


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nico
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 4:07 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Netdot-users] Setting up a new server

Hello,

I'm in the proccess of setting up a new server for my Netdot installation.
I'm curious about the best way to do it and about performance compared to 
others. I've read an old email where Carlos Vicente said, with
2000+ devices the -DIFAT proccess took like 50 minutes, wich seems
amazingly few time to me.

Current Setup:

Hardware: Regular desktop PC, hp compaq 8200 small form factor, 8Gb RAM, 
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz, "normal" 1GB sata disk
Software: Ubuntu LTS 12.04 netdot 1.0.5-rc1 + mysql devices monitored: 1706 
Total Macs in database: 105425 The time it takes to do a updatedevices -DIFAT 
varies beetwen 10 and 15 hours.

After convincing everyone that Netdot is good stuff, I've been given a real 
server in CPD to set it up:
New Hardware is ProLiant DL360 G7, 2 x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5649  @ 2.53GHz, 
16GB RAM, 2x160GB SAS disks (actually in raid0)

I have a few constraints, i have to use a God-Sent datacenter architecture that 
obligues me to have a frontend and backend stuff, throwing in some 
virtualization is also a must. So i'm thinking on setting 2 virtual machines, 
one to run the only the database and the other the rest (apache + polling).

On the same mail i talked about, Carlos said they use one server for database + 
apache and another one for polling. So i decided to send this message to share 
my thoughts, and maybe get some advice or learn from other's experiences. With 
some fact backing me up, maybe i can get rid of the virtualization and 
backeend-frontend stuff. Don't think it will do any good as it all runs of the 
same hardware, but maybe i should install on backend apache+mysql (apache 
backend lol) and on the frontend just the polling or viceversa.

Greetings,
--
Nico
_______________________________________________
Netdot-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users

-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4335 / Virus Database: 3705/7121 - Release Date: 02/24/14



------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Netdot-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://osl.uoregon.edu/mailman/listinfo/netdot-users


End of Netdot-users Digest, Vol 63, Issue 13
********************************************

Reply via email to