So did you pull an all-nighter, too? Maybe we should form an ND support
group! ;-)
-- Curt
At 06:07 AM 6/4/99 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>
>That's true. But I must admit I really miss Oracle's handy DECODE!
>
>Thx for replying.
>JT
>
>
>
> (Embedded
> image moved Curt Springer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> to file: 06/04/99 03:39 AM
> pic24330.pcx)
>
>
>
>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>cc: (bcc: Janet Traub/IS/SSC/THD)
>Subject: Re: [ND] Using Stored procedures for transaction management
>
>
>
>
>That route will be more attractive when (and yes, it's coming or here
>already, depending on dbms and version) one is able to write stored
>procedures in vanilla java and not some bastardized proprietary extension
>of SQL.
>
>-- Curt
>
>At 01:40 AM 6/4/99 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>I'm not used to using stored procedures but recently I was looking over some
>>one's ND4 code (for an app that talks to Informix 7) and I noticed that
>stored
>>procedures were used whenever a series of INSERT/DELETEs needed to be
>executed
>>as a transaction. That looked like a smart coding technique to me, and I'd
>like
>>to get other opinions.
>>
>>Do you recommend using SPs like that? Pros/cons?
>>
>>Thanks!
>>Janet
>>
>>
>>_________________________________________________________________________
>>
>>For help in using, subscribing, and unsubscribing to the discussion
>>forums, please go to: http://www.netdynamics.com/support/visitdevfor.html
>>
>>For dire need help, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>_________________________________________________________________________
>
>For help in using, subscribing, and unsubscribing to the discussion
>forums, please go to: http://www.netdynamics.com/support/visitdevfor.html
>
>For dire need help, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
_________________________________________________________________________
For help in using, subscribing, and unsubscribing to the discussion
forums, please go to: http://www.netdynamics.com/support/visitdevfor.html
For dire need help, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
