Damian,
This is a very good question, SUN/ND should give us a clear guideline on
what we could move forward.
DY
Damian O'Connor wrote:
>
> Sorry about the subject. Maybe there is a
> tool called iPlant, not iPlanet out there!
>
> Damian
>
> "Damian O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >Hi folks,
> >
> >Firstly I'd like to say I use this forum
> >considerably and hold in high regard the
> >information that is posted here. Undoubtly
> >it has saved our team months of work when we
> >moved from ND3 to ND4 earlier this year.
> >
> >Now though, what do we do? We have a
> >considerable amount of work coming up early
> >next year and with the demise of ND4 support
> >we are looking at our possible path forward.
> >
> >Do we go ND4->ND5->iPlanet, or do we take a
> >risk and go ND4->iPlanet. Do we drop ND
> >completely and go something else? Given that we didn't fully move to the ND4 event
>model
> >what are our risks by going directly to ND5
> >or iPlanet? What code migration is required?
> >
> >We don't use EJB's so if we move ND5->iPlant
> >should we write EJB's to allow us to move
> >to J2EE. To be honest the whole thing is
> >confusing and I'm hoping somebody out there
> >is in the same position and has evaluated
> >the best path forward. The discussions in
> >this forum to date give me the impression
> >that alot of people are in the same boat as
> >ourselves.
> >
> >ND have given us some good feedback, but
> >what is the average punter doing?
> >
> >Regards,
> >Damian O'Connor
> >Hewlett Packard
> >Ireland
> >
_________________________________________________________________________
For help in using, subscribing, and unsubscribing to the discussion
forums, please go to: http://www.netdynamics.com/support/visitdevfor.html
For dire need help, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
