On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 03:52:04PM -0800, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote: > >>>>> "Andre" == Andre Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Andre> Hello. The newnat patch in cvs is broken again with this > Andre> new kernel. > > Andre> sigh.. When will this be included in the stock kernel to > Andre> put an end to the patching problems? > > The kernel maintainers are using "Bitkeeper" now. Perhaps a > transition should be made to that tool? I personally have not > investigated it much yet. I wonder how it compares to CVS?
Please, I don't want a discussion about bitkeeper here, since it's strictly off-topic. I for myself are _STRONGLY_ against using any proprietary development tools for free software projects. I'm not going to be a leader in any free software project which uses proprietary development tools. Either the project doesn't use it, or I'm out of that project. As for netfilter/iptables, we will stick for CVS (or maybe other free alternatives like Subversion in the future). > -- > mailto: (Karl M. Hegbloom) [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Live long and prosper - Harald Welte / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ GCS/E/IT d- s-: a-- C+++ UL++++$ P+++ L++++$ E--- W- N++ o? K- w--- O- M+ V-- PS++ PE-- Y++ PGP++ t+ 5-- !X !R tv-- b+++ !DI !D G+ e* h--- r++ y+(*)
