Máté Eckl <[email protected]> wrote: > Originally I also added the following lines but it made the print too slow for > the test to pass. > > It printed the following warning: > inet/socket.t: WARNING: line 8: 'add rule ip sockip4 sockchain socket > exists': 'socket exists' mismatches 'socke' > inet/socket.t: WARNING: line 9: 'add rule ip sockip4 sockchain socket > flags transparent': 'socket flags transparent' mismatches 'socket' > > To be honest I don't know what this criterion means so if it is important > please > notify me. > > diff --git a/src/statement.c b/src/statement.c > index ff6a98a..ec3b0c0 100644 > --- a/src/statement.c > +++ b/src/statement.c > @@ -183,6 +183,10 @@ static void socket_stmt_print(const struct stmt *stmt, > struct output_ctx *octx) > *existance_str = (s->exists) ? "exists" : "missing"; > > nft_print(octx, "socket"); > + > + if(octx->stateless) > + return;
This test makes no sense, socket match has no state. This is for 'nft -s' which e.g. prints 'counter' instead of 'counter x packets y bytes'. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
