TD - Sales International Holland B.V. wrote: >On Monday 18 February 2002 13:45, gs-list stuffed this into my mailbox: > >That really depends on your knowledge, since you can fake (afaik) everying in >smtp. So, you spam a security list, fake your coming from <company i >hate>.com and have them hacked. >Besides that, (I haven't looked at the headers tho') he's using yahoo, and I >don't know if they send the IP from the sender along, even if they do, your >not sure it's him. It could be a dial-up line in use by somebody else now who >has nothing to do with the spammer and lotsa other stuff....... > >I mailed [EMAIL PROTECTED] as well as his yahoo account and this list > >regards > Thats right but if it is comercial advertisement, all recipents on the list i think have the right to send protest mails to the firm from where the offer come or the firm wich product is adverted.
The ground is very simple if an user link to an page where law conflicting stuff is, the firm can go to the page or also to the user who links. So why not do the same on spamming. Let all user protest there the provit of the spam goes to, if it's the wrong firm so it's there trademark and they they should not only have rights frome an trademark but also things to do, to make sure that its not used for spamm. Cu Thomas Lußnig
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
