On 2015-05-21 19:46, Andy Bierman wrote: > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Per Hedeland <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 2015-05-21 19:14, Andy Bierman wrote: >>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Ladislav Lhotka <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> RFC 6020 also states that must and when expessions are XPath 1.0, and we >>>> are moving away from it. This is IMO a much bigger change than Y45-04. >>>> >>> >>> Show me the "MUST NOT" that is getting reversed and I will agree with you. >>> I am not objecting to Y45-04. I am objecting to removing a "MUST NOT" >>> from the standard. Discussion of relative implementation complexity >>> of other YANG 1.1 changes is irrelevant. >> >> I don't have one for that, but these are: >> >> A member type can be of any built-in or derived type, except it MUST >> NOT be one of the built-in types "empty" or "leafref". >> >> I believe they're described as CLR in the issues doc... >> > > I don't know about leafref, but type "empty" and a zero-length string > are identical on the wire, and that is allowed. This is a trivial > change to YANG syntax. I don't think Y45 has such a trivial impact > on YANG syntax or usage.
Probably not (though the needed server implementation change is not likely to be as trivial as the syntax change), but you said that you weren't objecting to Y45, but to removing a "MUST NOT"... --Per _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
