On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 1:37 AM, Martin Bjorklund <[email protected]> wrote: > Ladislav Lhotka <[email protected]> wrote: >> Martin Bjorklund <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > Andy, >> > >> > I don't think the implementation burden on the server is that heavy. >> > A YANG 1.0 compliant server today supports: >> > >> > leaf a in module A of type foo from foo@2001-01-01 >> > leaf b in module B of type foo from foo@2002-02-02 >> >> In fact, the same can be done in two submodules of the same module, or >> main module and submodule, which leads exactly to the situation below - >> and that's allowed even in YANG 1.0. > > Yes, you're right! Which makes the current MUST NOT more of a CLR. >
Completely wrong because each submodule is its own context and you cannot combine multiple revisions of any module in any 1 submodule. All XPath and other statements in the submodule will only be using 1 revision of any of the submodules or modules it can access. > > /martin Andy _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
