Hi,
Currently we have an inconsistency in
draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-05. With Y35, we allow type empty in
unions. But section 7.8.2 says:
A leaf that is part of the key can be of any built-in or derived
type, except it MUST NOT be the built-in type "empty".
This means that this is legal:
typedef my-empty {
type union {
type empty;
}
}
list foo {
key id;
leaf id {
type my-empty;
}
...
}
I suggest we allow type empty also in keys:
NEW:
A leaf that is part of the key can be of any built-in or derived
type.
/martin
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
