Juergen Schoenwaelder writes: >And my understanding is that the list foo defined above will never >have an instance, correct? I assume decent compilers will continue to >create warnings when they can decide that a list will never have any >instances. (And yes, there are other ways to construct such lists, so >I am OK with removing a constraint preventing a specific case of such >useless lists.)
Doesn't removing the prohibition require us to accept such nonsense? Thanks, Phil _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
