Benoit Claise <[email protected]> writes: > Hi Lada, >> >>>>> >>>>> - In the introduction, you mention: >>>>> Typical use cases are: >>>>> >>>>> o Deactivating a subtree in a configuration datastore while keeping >>>>> the data in place. >>>>> >>>>> o Complementing data model information with instance-specific data. >>>>> >>>>> o RPC operations may use metadata annotations for various purposes >>>>> in both requests and responses. For example, the <edit-config> >>>>> operation in the NETCONF protocol (seesection 7.2 of [RFC6241] >>>>> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6241#section-7.2>) >>>>> uses annotations in the form of XML attributes for identifying the >>>>> point in the configuration and type of the operation. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Don't you have any other examples than those 3? >>>>> What about showing these examples with the spec. in this document? >>>>> Note: I see that the first one is documented with module >>>>> example-inactive >>>> Well, the backlash I received with >>>> draft-lhotka-netmod-yang-annotations-00 (expired) show that whilst there >>>> is consensus about general utility of annotations, practical definitions >>>> may be controversial. >>> Even as example? >> Yes, I am afraid. > I would be in favor to have at the very minimum one example. > Otherwise, it's difficult to visualize how these metadata should be > used.
Sure, there will be at least one. I just have to select an appropriate one to demonstrate the intended use without stirring up some ghosts. Lada > > Regards, Benoit (as a contributor) -- Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
