>But don't get mw wrong, syntactically annotations would be allowed >everywhere although in some places they may be a no-op.
OK >This is also valid, see sec. 7.7.6 in RFC 6020: <snip/> I see, thanks. >>True, I'd rather we can find a solution for annotating XML lists. Until >> then, the draft SHOULD explicitly call it out as not supported. Maybe >> put in into an OPEN ISSUES section? > >But that means XML clients would be unable to receive some >information. Is it what we want? I agree that is not what we want. Do you have any ideas other than using a processing instruction inside an XML comment? Thanks, Kent (as a contributor) _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
