On 8/27/2015 8:23 AM, Andy Bierman wrote: > > I don't see the 6 modules that have already been published so far in RFCs > as the problem. I suggest focusing on the 194 modules that have not > been published.
100% agree > Should the IETF spend a year or two debating the ONE TRUE > PERFECT uber-tree? 6 months? No, IMO we should take a stab at it and go with our best understanding and consensus -- that is after all what the I*E*TF is all about. > How long will it take for all interested > vendors to agree where every little thing goes, before starting on any > of it. > The DT's proposal seems to be a consensus starting point (from my DT and individual perspective, based on *many* discussions with vendors and users) in at least the routing area. Outside the routing area, I've heard three or four individual objections. Not saying we have it right, but just that we have a solid start. Lou _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
