IMHO, there should a YANG Construct should allow modules to be reused within another module with a restriction of looping.
When the YANG modules organized at controller, or any manager, re use of grouping or a particular XPath mount makes life static in YANG. Br, Ambika Prasad Tripathy (ambtripa) -----Original Message----- From: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 6:30 PM To: Andy Bierman; Juergen Schoenwaelder; t. petch; Martin Bjorklund; netmod@ietf.org Subject: Re: [netmod] Y34 - root node On 8/27/2015 8:23 AM, Andy Bierman wrote: > > I don't see the 6 modules that have already been published so far in > RFCs as the problem. I suggest focusing on the 194 modules that have > not been published. 100% agree > Should the IETF spend a year or two debating the ONE TRUE PERFECT > uber-tree? 6 months? No, IMO we should take a stab at it and go with our best understanding and consensus -- that is after all what the I*E*TF is all about. > How long will it take for all interested vendors to agree where every > little thing goes, before starting on any of it. > The DT's proposal seems to be a consensus starting point (from my DT and individual perspective, based on *many* discussions with vendors and users) in at least the routing area. Outside the routing area, I've heard three or four individual objections. Not saying we have it right, but just that we have a solid start. Lou _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
