On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:54:18AM -0400, Nadeau Thomas wrote: > > After discussing a bit more with Kent, we wanted to slightly amend > the agenda for tomorrow to first start out with trying to wrap up the > discussion around the requirements. We will review the issues > as they are listed on the NETMOD Github issue tracker and try to > come to conclusions about the open issues: > > https://github.com/netmod-wg/opstate-reqs/issues >
We can review the issues but what we really need I think are proposals to define the terminology. Not creating proposals works well by reviewing issues in an interim online meeting. Perhaps Kent can come up with a proposal, put it down somewhere (e.g. a revision of the I-D) and then let the mailing list bash out the details. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
