Kent,
Thank you for the update. A couple of points below.
On 9/30/2015 11:09 AM, Kent Watsen wrote:
> Hi Lou,
>
> We (the chairs) are in the process of closing the issues filed against
> draft-chairs-netmod-opstate-reqs. There is a documented process (state
> machine) for this here:
> https://github.com/netmod-wg/opstate-reqs/blob/master/README.md#issue-track
> ing. The issues are closed via WG consensus, specifically the VERIFY
> state confirms the consensus on the mailing list.
>
> So far we're off to a slow start - only 1 of 7 issues has made it to the
> EDIT state. I believe progress is being impeded by a lack of
> participation from some.
Given the level of discussion to date and the previous statements by the
chairs, I hope you're not suggesting that we once again need to debate
each point before it's "verified". In fact, at the last meeting I
thought I heard that each requirements was at least in the "verify"
state and that the chairs would soon make a call on mailing list
verification -- based solely on new issues raised. Did I miss something?
> Still, the WG will complete this work in time
> and publish an updated draft, so that it san be referenced by follow-on
> solution drafts, in both the NETMOD and NETCONF WGs.
So given the formal WG process, isn't time for the draft to at least be
a wg draft?
Thanks,
Lou
>
> Thanks,
> Kent
>
>
>
> On 9/30/15, 2:56 AM, "Lou Berger" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Tom, chairs,
>>
>> At the last meeting, I believe I heard that a statement of consensus -
>> i.e., a consensus call - on the requirements would be made by the
>> chairs,
>> on list. (With the understanding that there are details of the
>> requirements
>> that will need to be documented, presumably in a WG version of the chairs
>> requirements draft.)
>>
>> Are we at the point yet were this call can/will be made?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Lou
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On September 29, 2015 3:53:56 PM Nadeau Thomas <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> After going over the plan with Kent, we would like to continue the
>>> agenda
>>> from the
>>> last interim meeting on Thursday. That is to say, Kent will continue
>>> with
>>> the comparison
>>> of solutions. From last time and in parallel with this, the WG
>>> discussion
>>> around the requirements
>>> seems to be converging on a detailed level of refinement of the
>>> requirements. We will
>>> recap the status here and goals.
>>>
>>> The details of the meeting are here:
>>>
>>>
>>> The NETCONF Data Modeling Language (netmod) Working Group will hold a
>>> virtual interim meeting on Thursday, October 1, 2015 at 10am EDT (7am
>>> PDT;
>>> 2pm GMT).
>>>
>>> The title is ³Openconfig Solutions Discussion (continued)².
>>>
>>> The WebEx is:
>>>
>>> Meeting number:640 686 530
>>> Meeting password:1234
>>> Audio connection:
>>> 1-877-668-4493 Call-in toll free number (US/Canada)
>>> 1-650-479-3208 Call-in toll number (US/Canada)
>>> Access code: 640 686 530
>>> Meeting link:
>>> https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/j.php?MTID=mf12aa8d28a159614cb415f2f32dcbebf
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --Tom (as WG co-chair)
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> netmod mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> netmod mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
