On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 09:19:45AM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > > Conformance to YANG for the extension: NONE This includes syntax and > > semantics. It makes no sense at all (Lada is right) to say the > > extension semantics apply. They only apply if the tool supports the > > extension. Conformance to the extension is a different matter. > > I would hope that a server supporting NACM implements the behaviour of > nacm:default-deny-write when nodes are tagged with this extension. > Sure, a YANG parser is allowed to skip over nacm:default-deny-write > but if nacm:default-deny-write is used for a certain node, I think we > want the server to implement the semantics implied by > nacm:default-deny-write regardless which tool the developer used. > > I do not agree. The semantics for this YANG extension only apply to NACM. Of course an implementation of NACM cannot ignore this extension. The extensions says what to do in NACM if the tag is found. (As it should). It does not define any behavior outside of NACM. No other tool except a NETCONF server implementation of NACM has any conformance requirement to implement this extension. /js > Andy > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> >
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
