Hi, IMO we do not need lots of rules for when-stmt. They are harder to enforce than just implementing the auto-deletion.
Note that auto-deletion also applies to nodes already in candidate or running. It is just a derivative case to have a newly-created node deleted right away. If you add node /foo it may cause node /bar and node /baz to get deleted. I strongly object to treating a false when-stmt in a datastore validation as an error. This is not how YANG 1.0 works, and this is not backward-compatible. Andy On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 5:16 AM, Balazs Lengyel <[email protected] > wrote: > Hello Martin, > I would want to codify this. My earlier proposal was: > > - when MUST NOT be dependent on a data node controlled by a when or choice > statement > > Notice the strong MUST NOT statement. This would simplify life greatly. > regards Balazs > > On 2015-10-20 10:09, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > >> I have never seen anyone trying to refer to the conditional nodes in a >> when expression - simply b/c it doesn't make any sense. >> > > -- > Balazs Lengyel Ericsson Hungary Ltd. > Senior Specialist > ECN: 831 7320 > Mobile: +36-70-330-7909 email: [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
