Hello, In the netmod meeting during IETF in Yokohama, there was a discussion on putting in place a guideline and a shortcut to easily create globally unique URNs as enterprise YANG module namespaces. For details, please see <https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/slides/slides-94-netmod-5.pdf> or <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-netmod-enterprise-yang-namespace/> . The gist of the proposal is to create globally unique enterprise YANG module namespaces by creating URNs based on registered domain names (DNS names), in reverse, e.g. urn:com:example:... .
During the meeting, there was a suggestion to create a new top-level URN namespace, e.g. "rdns", to which reverse DNSnames are appended. With a brand new top-level URN namespace, the resulting enterprise YANG module namespace pattern would be something like "urn:rdns:com:example:...". For the new top-level URN namespace, are there any objections to using "rdns"? Thanks, Helen _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
