On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 04:06:26PM +0000, Ing-Wher Chen wrote: > > With a brand new top-level URN namespace, the resulting > enterprise YANG module namespace pattern would be something > like "urn:rdns:com:example:...". > > For the new top-level URN namespace, are there any objections > to using "rdns"? >
I think you need to officially allocate such a namespace and I think there is some kind of 'review board' that reviews allocation requests. See RFC 3406 as a starting point. Existing registered namespaces can be found here: http://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces/urn-namespaces.xhtml /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
