Versioning has come up in previous conversations I've been a part of, and I was led to believe that it does not really exist for yang modules. That is, if you update a published module it's a completely new model with no-expectation of compatibility with previous models.
Is it the case that there's no way to "bump the minor version" of a model (i.e., you make only additions, but no deletions or changes to meaning so that the model can be considered backward compatible)? Thanks, Chris. Ladislav Lhotka <[email protected]> writes: > Hi, > > if we want people to take YANG modules appearing in I-Ds seriously and > implement them, then we should apply the revisioning rules to them. That is, > if a module changes between two I-D revisions, then its revision-date has to > be bumped and a new entry added to the revision history. As it is now, the > I-D-based modules are esentially revisionless. > > Lada
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
