In a model where the choice shorthand notation is being used, it is necessary
to use longhand notation if wanting a case statement to be defined by the
‘uses’ statement. That is, 6020bis allows ‘uses’ as a sub-statement to the
‘case’ statement, but not to the ‘choice’ statement. As an example, this
choice statement:
choice interface-type {
case ethernet {
uses ethernet;
}
case optical {
uses optical;
}
}
Cannot use shorthand notation:
choice interface-type {
uses ethernet;
uses optical;
}
This seems like a bug to me. Is it too late to fix in 6020bis as an issue
raised by WGLC?
Kent // as a contributor
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
