> On 02 Feb 2016, at 18:39, Kent Watsen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > In a model where the choice shorthand notation is being used, it is necessary > to use longhand notation if wanting a case statement to be defined by the > ‘uses’ statement. That is, 6020bis allows ‘uses’ as a sub-statement to the > ‘case’ statement, but not to the ‘choice’ statement. As an example, this > choice statement: > > choice interface-type { > case ethernet { > uses ethernet; > } > case optical { > uses optical; > } > } > > Cannot use shorthand notation: > > choice interface-type { > uses ethernet; > uses optical; > } > > > This seems like a bug to me. Is it too late to fix in 6020bis as an issue > raised by WGLC?
This has already been discussed, see https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?email_list=netmod&gbt=1&index=uF7kbBPMxIBAMUm03D3AqxaJvK4 Lada > > Kent // as a contributor > > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod -- Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
