Hi, It should be up to the co-chairs to make consensus calls. The IETF 94 minutes indicate that "solution 2" (RPC-based) had consensus in the room.
https://tools.ietf.org/wg/netmod/minutes?item=minutes-94-netmod.html I have not seen any evidence that room consensus has changed on the mailing list. Andy On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Lou Berger <[email protected]> wrote: > [retry] > > Martin, > > > On 2/8/2016 3:42 PM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Lou Berger <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Martin, > >> Thanks for the response. See below. > >> > >> On 2/8/2016 1:57 PM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Lou Berger <[email protected]> wrote: > > [...] > > > >>>> But it's > >>>> also clear that some in the WG would prefer Option 2 (and most/all of > >>>> these are its coauthors.) > >>> This was the preferred solution of the room in Yokohama. 2 of the 4 > >>> authors were present. > >> sure. And we know that the IETF consensus is not judged by who is in > >> the room. It is of course useful information to the WG and the chairs. > > You wrote "most/all of [those who prefer option 2] are its coauthors". > I was referring to the on-list discussion, but fair point. But keep in > mind that an in-person meeting isn't an authoritative source of WG > consensus from the IETF process standpoint. > > > My observation was that just 2 of the coauthors were in the room, and > > still this was the preferred solution; thus I think that your > > statement that I quoted is incorrect. > > > okay, let me modify my comment: > OLD > and most/all of these are its coauthors > NEW > at very least its coauthors > > Lou > > > /martin > > > > >
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
