Juergen Schoenwaelder <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > the final check of the YANG 1.1 WG last call edits has passed and so > we are getting ready to wrap things up. While working on the document > writeup that goes to the IESG, I found a quirks that I think we should > fix before sending the document to Benoit: > > 1) ID nits identified two instances of 'MUST not' that should be > 'MUST NOT'.
Fixed. > 2) The capability URN registration requires to define a capability > name. Right now we only provide a URL. The IANA considerations > need to define the capability name, e.g. :yang-library. Fixed. > 3) I checked the ABNF against http://tools.ietf.org/tools/bap/abnf.cgi. > Note that I had to replace '%s' with '' since this tool does not yet > support RFC 7405 (case sensitive strings). Anyway, the tool does a > good job and suggested these two changes: > > - yang-char = %x9 / %xA / %xD / %x20-D7FF / > + yang-char = %x09 / %x0A / %x0D / %x20-D7FF / > > - relative-path = 1*(".." "/") descendant-path > + relative-path = 1*"../" descendant-path Fixed. > In addition, the tool suggested to add a couple of parenthesis so > that the reader does not have to remember operator precedences by > heart. I think Martin should take a look at this and decide which > ones to incorporate (or if there is even an error lingering > somewhere). I checked this, but I prefer to keep the current rules. > In addition, there was the suggestion on the mailing list to mention > the change of the non-config leaf-lists uniqueness in the 'Summary of > Changes from RFC 6020' which I think should be implemented. Fixed. > Martin, can you look at these issues and post a new I-D? Once > available, I will check the diffs, finish my writeup and then submit > the document to Benoit. There is one more open issue; see the thread "Multiple deviations with same target". /martin _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
