> On 24 Mar 2016, at 16:06, Eliot Lear <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Lada, > > On 3/24/16 3:23 PM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> Hi Eliot, >> >> I agree it would be useful to be able to sign configuration data in an >> encoding-independent way, but it is not an aim of this document to deal with >> this problem. Encoding-specific approaches are of course available, this >> probably needn't be mentioned. > > I totally understand, and I'm not even asking that this group take on > coding that stuff in an independent way. A simple reference in security > considerations along the lines that Kent suggested is fine.
OK, let's do it. Lada > > Eliot > > -- Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
