Hi, in the thread [1], we agreed that it is necessary to prevent actions (and notifications) being defined on a state data node that is (or its ancestor is) a list for which no keys are defined because then the instance to which the action is tied may not be uniquely defined. The rfc6020bis-11 doesn't address this situation though. Is it still possible to add a corresponding text to sections 7.15 and 7.16?
Lada [1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg14936.html -- Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
