Juergen, Of course, it is not confusing to you because you are in the box (vs. many of us are outside the box looking in).
RFC 6020 doesn't say all identities have to have a sub-identity. My opinion only. Linda -----Original Message----- From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 10:38 AM To: Linda Dunbar Cc: [email protected]; '[email protected]'; Thomas D. Nadeau Subject: Re: Can you remove the "Identity acl-base" defined in draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-07 On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 03:07:30PM +0000, Linda Dunbar wrote: > Juergen, > > If "acl-base" has some content more than the comment (i.e. the description), > then it makes sense. > > The comments in the "identity ipv4-acl" is enough to describe the identity. > Same with the identity ipv6-acl. > > I find it is very confusing to have the recursive reference of identity (all > of them are simply the description). > I fail to see anything confusing here. Did you read the relevant sections of RFC 6020? What is unclear about identities and how they work? /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
