Linda,
Could you elaborate what difficulty you are facing?
The draft defines
typedef acl-type {
type identityref {
base acl-base;
}
}
This allows the acl-type to be ipv4-acl or ipv6-acl, or other new types
that inherit from acl-type.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Lisa
On 5/10/16, 9:55 AM, "Linda Dunbar" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Juergen,
>
>Of course, it is not confusing to you because you are in the box (vs.
>many of us are outside the box looking in).
>
>RFC 6020 doesn't say all identities have to have a sub-identity.
>
>
>My opinion only.
>
>
>Linda
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 10:38 AM
>To: Linda Dunbar
>Cc: [email protected]; '[email protected]'; Thomas D.
>Nadeau
>Subject: Re: Can you remove the "Identity acl-base" defined in
>draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-07
>
>On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 03:07:30PM +0000, Linda Dunbar wrote:
>> Juergen,
>>
>> If "acl-base" has some content more than the comment (i.e. the
>>description), then it makes sense.
>>
>> The comments in the "identity ipv4-acl" is enough to describe the
>>identity. Same with the identity ipv6-acl.
>>
>> I find it is very confusing to have the recursive reference of identity
>>(all of them are simply the description).
>>
>
>I fail to see anything confusing here. Did you read the relevant sections
>of RFC 6020? What is unclear about identities and how they work?
>
>/js
>
>--
>Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
>Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
>Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
