On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 08:59:20PM -0700, Suresh Krishnan wrote:
> Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-12: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Meta comment:
> 
> Shouldn't this document obsolete RFC6060. There is no Obsoletes: tag in
> the draft

I guess this is because there are a couple of RFCs that depend on
RFC6020 and so we can't retire RFC6020 right now.

> Section 4.2.4:
> 
> s/A reference a data tree node/A reference to a data tree node
> 
> Section 9.4.7:
> 
> It is not clear why the following refinement is illegal. Can you
> clarify?
> 
>      type my-base-str-type {
>        // illegal length refinement
>        length "1..999";
>      }
>

Because my-base-str-type is restricted to length "1..255" and you
can't enlarge the length restriction in a refinement.

> IANA considerations:
> 
> Not sure what is the correct method for doing this in -bis documents, but
> I would have expected a note that instructs IANA to switch references to
> RFC6020 in IANA registries over to this one.

This is what the WG originally thought but then we got advice that the
original IANA allocation should stay in force...

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to