Juergen Schoenwaelder <[email protected]> writes: > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 08:59:20PM -0700, Suresh Krishnan wrote: >> Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for >> draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-12: No Objection >> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >> introductory paragraph, however.) >> >> >> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html >> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >> >> >> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis/ >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> COMMENT: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Meta comment: >> >> Shouldn't this document obsolete RFC6060. There is no Obsoletes: tag in >> the draft > > I guess this is because there are a couple of RFCs that depend on > RFC6020 and so we can't retire RFC6020 right now. > >> Section 4.2.4: >> >> s/A reference a data tree node/A reference to a data tree node >> >> Section 9.4.7: >> >> It is not clear why the following refinement is illegal. Can you >> clarify? >> >> type my-base-str-type { >> // illegal length refinement >> length "1..999"; >> } >> > > Because my-base-str-type is restricted to length "1..255" and you > can't enlarge the length restriction in a refinement. > >> IANA considerations: >> >> Not sure what is the correct method for doing this in -bis documents, but >> I would have expected a note that instructs IANA to switch references to >> RFC6020 in IANA registries over to this one. > > This is what the WG originally thought but then we got advice that the > original IANA allocation should stay in force...
Right, and this is also, I believe, a specific reason why 6020 cannot be obsoleted. Lada > > /js > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod -- Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
