Lou and I were looking a draft today and were wondering if the YANG Module
Template in 6087bis makes sense. Here’s the template:
contact
"WG Web: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/your-wg-name/>
WG List: <mailto:[email protected]>
WG Chair: your-WG-chair
<mailto:[email protected]>
Editor: your-name
<mailto:[email protected]>";
6020 says:
The "contact" statement provides contact information for the module.
The argument is a string that is used to specify contact information
for the person or persons to whom technical queries concerning this
module should be sent, such as their name, postal address, telephone
number, and electronic mail address.
6087biz says:
The contact statement MUST be present. If the module is contained in
a document intended for Standards Track status, then the working
group web and mailing information MUST be present, and the main
document author or editor contact information SHOULD be present. If
additional authors or editors exist, their contact information MAY be
present. In addition, the Area Director and other contact
information MAY be present.
It seems that our primary goal is to have questions directed to the working
group. Does it really make sense to have chairs or ADs listed? That said, we
understand listing authors, as they’re listed in RFCs too.
One related nit, is the “WG” acronym widely known enough to use it in the
template? How the following instead?
OLD
contact
"WG Web: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/your-wg-name/>
WG List: <mailto:[email protected]>
NEW
contact
"Web Page: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/your-wg-name/>
Mailing List: <mailto:[email protected]>
Kent (and Lou)
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
