Kent Watsen <[email protected]> writes: > One related nit, is the "WG" acronym widely known enough to use it in > the template? How the following instead? > > OLD > contact > "WG Web: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/your-wg-name/> > WG List: <mailto:[email protected]> > > NEW > contact > "Web Page: <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/your-wg-name/> > Mailing List: <mailto:[email protected]>
If you take out the acronym "WG", in what way does that make the remaining words more descriptive? I can see arguing for "WG Web Page" and "WG Mailing List", though. Dale _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
