Hi, Michal Vaško <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > in NETCONF server draft [1] there is ietf-ssh-server model. It defines > feature "ssh-x509-certs" and then uses it twice in a > grouping. Referring to RFC 6020 [2] (I haven't noticed any difference > in the YANG 1.1 draft), in a grouping prefixes, type names, grouping > names, and extensions should be resolved in the context of the uses > that referenced this grouping. What about if-feature, where should > that be resolved?
It is resolved locally (lexically). > Either way, to my understanding, there is one > "ssh-x509-certs" feature definition redundant, either in > ietf-netconf-server or in ietf-ssh-server. Thanks for clarification. Hmm, I think the one in ietf-netconf-server should be removed. But this should really go to the netconf list. /martin > > Regards, > Michal Vasko > > [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-server-model-09 > [2] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6020#section-7.11 > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
