Hi, in NETCONF server draft [1] there is ietf-ssh-server model. It defines feature "ssh-x509-certs" and then uses it twice in a grouping. Referring to RFC 6020 [2] (I haven't noticed any difference in the YANG 1.1 draft), in a grouping prefixes, type names, grouping names, and extensions should be resolved in the context of the uses that referenced this grouping. What about if-feature, where should that be resolved? Either way, to my understanding, there is one "ssh-x509-certs" feature definition redundant, either in ietf-netconf-server or in ietf-ssh-server. Thanks for clarification.
Regards, Michal Vasko [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-server-model-09 [2] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6020#section-7.11 _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
