> On 02 Aug 2016, at 18:35, Balazs Lengyel <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > If we allow foo and foo-state for opstate, mounting models atop such a multi > rooted yang module will be fun. > mount modB-config-part onto modA-config-part > mount modB-state-part onto modA-state-part > One mount becomes two and you have to maintain parallel mounts otherwise you > are mounting half modules.
This is already happenning with augments. It means some work but nothing terribly complex. > > Actually the problem is not caused by opstate, but rather by multi-rooted > models. but avoiding foo-state would make life easier once more. We already agreed that some items (such as RIBs) are "true" state which don't have direct counterparts in configuration. If we don't have foo-state, where are these supposed to be placed? Lada > > regards Balazs > > -- > Balazs Lengyel Ericsson Hungary Ltd. > Senior Specialist > Mobile: +36-70-330-7909 email: [email protected] > -- Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
