On 03/08/2016 07:49, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
On 02 Aug 2016, at 18:35, Balazs Lengyel <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello,
If we allow foo and foo-state for opstate, mounting models atop such a multi
rooted yang module will be fun.
mount modB-config-part onto modA-config-part
mount modB-state-part onto modA-state-part
One mount becomes two and you have to maintain parallel mounts otherwise you
are mounting half modules.
This is already happenning with augments. It means some work but nothing
terribly complex.
Actually the problem is not caused by opstate, but rather by multi-rooted
models. but avoiding foo-state would make life easier once more.
We already agreed that some items (such as RIBs) are "true" state which don't
have direct counterparts in configuration. If we don't have foo-state, where are these
supposed to be placed?
One choice is that they could just be placed under foo, where foo is a
config false leaf.
Rob
Lada
regards Balazs
--
Balazs Lengyel Ericsson Hungary Ltd.
Senior Specialist
Mobile: +36-70-330-7909 email: [email protected]
--
Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C
.
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
