On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 09:34:33AM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > On 13 Sep 2016, at 09:01, Yves Beauville <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Both RFC 6020 and RFC 7950 are providing the same requirement in section > > 'Payload Parsing': > > o If data for a node tagged with "when" is present, and the "when" > > condition evaluates to "false", the server MUST reply with an > > "unknown-element" error-tag in the rpc-error. > > This section seems confusing. It makes no sense to evaluate "when" or "must" > on the contents of a protocol message such as edit-config because accessible > trees for XPath evaluations are defined in sec. 6.4.1 in terms of datastores > and "all state data". >
I agree that this bullet in section 8.3.1 looks odd. Perhaps Martin recalls why this was written in the first place? /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
