Juergen Schoenwaelder <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 09:34:33AM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > > > On 13 Sep 2016, at 09:01, Yves Beauville <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Both RFC 6020 and RFC 7950 are providing the same requirement in section > > > 'Payload Parsing': > > > o If data for a node tagged with "when" is present, and the "when" > > > condition evaluates to "false", the server MUST reply with an > > > "unknown-element" error-tag in the rpc-error. > > > > This section seems confusing. It makes no sense to evaluate "when" or > > "must" on the contents of a protocol message such as edit-config because > > accessible trees for XPath evaluations are defined in sec. 6.4.1 in terms > > of datastores and "all state data". > > > > I agree that this bullet in section 8.3.1 looks odd. Perhaps Martin > recalls why this was written in the first place?
No. It is however the same in 6020 and 7950. I think the fourth bullet in 8.3.2 is probably more clear, at least for edit-config. The bullet in 8.3.1 also covers copy-config. The problem with the bullet in 8.3.1 seems to be that it is not clear that the condition is checked after the whole message has been parsed. /martin _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
