No I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft

Thanks,
Lisa

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Kent Watsen <kwat...@juniper.net> wrote:

>
>
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>
>
>
> As part of the WG Last Call, are you aware of any IPR that applies to
> draft identified above?  Please state either:
>
>   * "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>
>   * "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
>
>
> If “yes”, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?   Please state
> either:
>
>   * "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>
>   * "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
>
>
> If you answer “no”, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate.
>
>
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage
> until a response has been received from each author and listed contributor.
> NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
>
>
>
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the
> IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of
> IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in
> any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR.  For more
> information, please see the RFCs listed above and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>
>
>
> PS: Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> NETMOD WG Chairs
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to