On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 10:54:14AM +0000, Robert Wilton wrote: > > Assuming that diagnostics information was specified for each of N different > protocols on a device. Then this would seem to mean that every device would > have to install N default NACM deny entries (one for each supported > protocol) to ensure that the device has sensible default operator semantics. > This would seem to be quite a burden on the industry. > > A solution that doesn't rely on every server inserting lots of NACM entries > by default seems like a better choice to me. >
Did I say that there need to be N? And why would N hard coded toggles in data models be simpler and not a burden for the industry? What is the definition of 'burden for the industry' anyway? /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
