Benoit Claise <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear draft-ietf-netmod-entity authors, > > As mentioned by Tim Carey during the last IETF meeting, BBF work > depends on the draft-ietf-netmod-entity-01. > > Message from BBF: > > We are now in the final stages of reviewing “TR-383” “Common YANG” > modules that have the following dependencies: > > * iana-entity > * iana-if-type > * ietf-hardware > * ietf-inet-types > * ietf-interfaces > * ietf-system > * ietf-yang-types > > If all goes to plan, the TR-383 modules will be published in March > 2017, but you can see that there is a dependency on iana-entity and > ietf-hardware, which are currently taken from > draft-ietf-netmod-entity-01. We will potentially need to reference > draft versions? > > I hope we all agree that referencing a draft version is not ideal. > Would it be possible to progress draft-ietf-netmod-entity, and > therefore help our BBF friends?
What we need is a WG discussion on the open issues. I will send out one mail per open issue. > Is the March deadline a reachable goal? Even if we started WGLC today we would not have an RFC published in March... /martin _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
