Hi, William Lupton <[email protected]> wrote: > The current draft-ietf-netmod-entity-01 defines ietf-hardware and > iana-entity modules. Is it intended that iana-entity will become > iana-hardware? Thanks, W.
I don't have a strong opinion, but it probably makes sense. In the MIB, the word "entity" is just present in the MIB name: IANA-ENTITY-MIB defines the TC IANAPhysicalClass So in YANG we can do: iana-hardware defines the base identity physical-class (+ derived identities) /martin _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
