> On 16 Dec 2016, at 14:24, Juergen Schoenwaelder > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 12:48:56PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> Hi, >> >> 6087bis says in sec. 5.10: >> >> Top-level database data definitions MUST NOT be mandatory. >> >> It think this makes sense only for config=true nodes. It is absolutely OK to >> have mandatory top-level state data, and some published modules already have >> them, e.g. ietf-yang-library. >> >> Also, I wonder - should the text use "datastore" rather than "database"? >> > > We should not use the term 'database'. I do no think 'datastore' is > the appropriate replacement. Since this document talks about YANG, I > think the proper terms are data tree and schema tree (or any other > terms that the YANG specification defines).
Right - I think the following should do: OLD Top-level database data definitions MUST NOT be mandatory. NEW Top-level data nodes that represent configuration MUST NOT be mandatory. Lada > > /js > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> -- Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
